On Friday January 4th I attended the 14th
annual VALE User’s Conference. Where
have all these years gone? I remember
attending a meeting all those years ago when the concept of a consortium of
academic libraries was first discussed.
In 2013 were almost 300 librarians attending with a multitude of poster
and breakout sessions. As usual it was
nice to encounter colleagues from other New Jersey colleges. I will only comment on sessions that I
attended.
Session B01 – VALID Project Update: Project Planning and
Implementation Milestones
I have been following this project for several years and am
disappointed that it has not yet come to fruition. Marianne Gaunt, the University Librarian at
Rutgers, stated that project will hopefully be done in two years. It is my opinion that the project has moved
slowly since the members of the implementation task force are from different
institutions and can only devote so much time to this project. VuFind has been selected as the discovery
tool while the entire system will be on the Amazon Web Services Cloud
Server. This server will be located on
multiple servers and not hosted by one institution. Thus all member institutions will have
access.
Session B09 VALID: Reference and Resource Sharing Update
Joseph Deodato of Rutgers spoke about the features that were
recommended by the Reference Committee for the discovery layer. I actually chaired this subcommittee that
made these suggestions. Judy Matthew of
William Paterson University described how there would be a VALID circulation
policy that will create a seamless experience for users. Problems may be encountered when the
circulation policy of a college differs from that of the consortium as a whole.
Featured Speaker – Dr. Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President of
the Middle States Commission on Higher Education
She spoke on the role of librarians in the assessment
process. When a university is evaluated
by Middle States, the library should not stand alone. There must be accountability and
transparency in this process. Education should be competency based.
Session B20: Determining the most appropriate type(s) of a
assessment in library instruction – Bonnie Fong of Rutgers University
The assessment process considers who, what when, where and
how. These principles also apply in
journalism. We must determine what we
are trying to assess including the learning objectives and exactly what is
being taught. We must assess both pre-
and post-session.