For many years I have taught a class to environmental
engineering students who are assigned to write a descriptive paper. Some of the topics were:
1. Reduction of
Greenhouse Gases; innovative regulatory approaches, such as incentive-based
mechanisms, to achieve reductions fairly and efficiently
2. Nanomaterials
for drinking water treatment
3. Approaches
for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation
4. Performance
of innovative policy approaches, including economic incentives, and voluntary
programs for reducing pollution
5. Combined
Sewer Overflows; current conditions,
regulations and plans
6. Life cycle
analysis of hybrid, battery vs. conventional vehicles
I usually give my library lecture in week 3 or 4 of the
semester while the paper is not due until the very end of the term. This gives students about 10 weeks to do the
assignment which is certainly ample time.
Inevitably they will procrastinate and wait until the last minute. When I read the papers student will likely
cite more web sites than peer reviewed articles even after my lecture emphasized
searching databases to find articles.
I propose that my lecture be moved to later in the semester
for two reasons:
1.
A 5 week deadline may create a sense of urgency
forcing the students to immediately work on their assignment and not procrastinate.
2.
If they start their assignment shortly after the
library lecture they will remember to search for articles. Otherwise they will likely revert to their
old habits and Google away.
We’ll try it out next semester and see if my theory works.
No comments:
Post a Comment