Wednesday, December 21, 2011
The NJIT Library Holiday Party
It is said that a picture is worth a thousand words. The library staff had our annual holiday party at the Spanish Tavern in the Ironbound section of Newark
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
QANDANJ to Cease on December 31, 2011
The announcement was made on the web site today that the service is ending at the end of the year. It also states "discussions are ongoing regarding future plans for a new service." If readers of NJITBRUCE search this blog under QANDANJ they will find many comments that I have made over the years about specific reference questions and chat reference in general. I have mixed feelings about its demise. I have fielded many challenging questions through this service, but many of the patrons were disrespectful as they posed nuisance questions and often demanded an instant answer to a difficult question.
Michael Maziekien, the chair of the NJLA Taskforce on Virtual Reference reports that they are looking into other services and possible funding sources to continue chat reference. It is obvious that there will be a gap in statewide service.
I would be interested in participating in a new service as long as NJIT does not have to incur a cost. Over the years very few NJIT students accessed QANDANJ.
Michael Maziekien, the chair of the NJLA Taskforce on Virtual Reference reports that they are looking into other services and possible funding sources to continue chat reference. It is obvious that there will be a gap in statewide service.
I would be interested in participating in a new service as long as NJIT does not have to incur a cost. Over the years very few NJIT students accessed QANDANJ.
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Starting to Plan for the 2012 New Jersey Chemistry Olympics
It seems that we just held the 2011 New Jersey Chemistry Olympics , but last night was the first planning meeting for the 2012 event. For the first time Natalie Macke will be coordinating the competition succeeding Borislaw Bilash. This year I will am running the Information Search as I've done for many years. In part one of the event students are judged on the accuracy of a model of a molecule. This year students will bring in a model of a dye molecule. Students will use the internet in part two to answer questions about dyes.
Information on the details of each event and instructions on how each high school can register will be issued after the first of the calendar year. I observe that students have fun in participating in the various events.
Information on the details of each event and instructions on how each high school can register will be issued after the first of the calendar year. I observe that students have fun in participating in the various events.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
Comment on an article in the New York Times About Old Style Books
There is an article in today's New York Times titled Selling Books by Their Gilded Covers. I must say that in popular and scholarly publishing that e-books are here to stay and that this trend will continue. There are certainly some bibliophiles out there who still love the printed book. Fancy covers and book jackets can attract those readers to the traditional tome. I bought an Amazon Kindle last year and love the convenience of not having to schlep a heavy book in the subway. Of course, a year later there is the Amazon Kindle Fire which is a better e-reader.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Comments on the article "Upheaval at the New York Public Library"
Today Facebook friends Trevor Dawes and Ricky Waller provided a link to an article in The Nation titled Upheaval at the New York Public Library (http://www.thenation.com/article/164881/upheaval-new-york-public-library) . I would like to recall my experiences at NYPL when I worked there from 1983-1990 in the Science and Technology Division and then comment on the article.
The Science and Technology Division (STC) was in Room 121 of what was then known as the Central Research Building at 42nd Street and 5th Avenue. That division were merged with the Economics and Public Affairs division of the library in the 1990s and later moved to SIBL (Science Industry and Business Library) at Madison Avenue and 34th Street. The collection of STC was limited to the physical sciences and engineering disciplines. The biggest problem that I faced as a librarian was locating the items requested by patrons. The archaic Billings call letter system was used for older items while newer materials were shelved on the third floor of the stacks by size. Since the books and periodicals were in stacks not open to the public, patrons had to submit call slips and wait for the materials. The librarian had to determine whether the item was in Room 121 or in storage at the Annex at 521 West 43rd Street. This was often not an easy job and patrons became annoyed when they had to wait or find out that the desired item was in another building.
NYPL, of course is a research library with a non-circulating collection. It was often called the “Library of Last Resort.” Too many patrons perceived it as a popular library and were referred to the Mid-Manhattan Library across the street. A large amount of money was needed to fund resources and staffing to serve independent scholars not affiliated with a university. Sadly, we did get our share of derelicts and other undesirables who used the library. Back then there was no internet, so researchers had to use print resources. In the late 1980s we introduced CD-ROM based databases.
Let’s turn the clock to 2011 and the article mentioned above which discussed the Central Library Plan (CLP) for the landmark building now known as the Schwarzman Building. All libraries including NYPL have faced terrible budget cuts and had to cut staff and resources. The article states that a few specialized divisions were closed. The centerpiece of the CLP would be the construction of a state of the art computer orientated library. This would mean demolishing the stacks that hold 3 million books.
The controversy as stated in the article is to decide if the Schwarzman should remain as a depository for scholarly printed materials or should it become a computer orientated library. At the risk of the ire of some of my librarian colleagues, I choose the latter.
Over the past 20 years more and more popular and scholarly publications have become electronic. I have seen many students refuse to touch a print resource even if it has the information they need. A move to an electronic library will actually bring more people to NYPL which implies more private funds coming in. The printed materials that are displaced can be moved to either the stack extension under Bryant Park or the storage facility in Princeton, NJ. As time passes, these materials will be used less often. If there is a space problem, perhaps some of the research libraries such as NYU or Columbia can adopt them. The article states that there is a pilot program in place that allows certain NYPL users to check out books from Columbia or NYU. In any event, it would be impossible to digitize every scholarly publication.
Just some thoughts from a librarian with over 30 years in the field.
The Science and Technology Division (STC) was in Room 121 of what was then known as the Central Research Building at 42nd Street and 5th Avenue. That division were merged with the Economics and Public Affairs division of the library in the 1990s and later moved to SIBL (Science Industry and Business Library) at Madison Avenue and 34th Street. The collection of STC was limited to the physical sciences and engineering disciplines. The biggest problem that I faced as a librarian was locating the items requested by patrons. The archaic Billings call letter system was used for older items while newer materials were shelved on the third floor of the stacks by size. Since the books and periodicals were in stacks not open to the public, patrons had to submit call slips and wait for the materials. The librarian had to determine whether the item was in Room 121 or in storage at the Annex at 521 West 43rd Street. This was often not an easy job and patrons became annoyed when they had to wait or find out that the desired item was in another building.
NYPL, of course is a research library with a non-circulating collection. It was often called the “Library of Last Resort.” Too many patrons perceived it as a popular library and were referred to the Mid-Manhattan Library across the street. A large amount of money was needed to fund resources and staffing to serve independent scholars not affiliated with a university. Sadly, we did get our share of derelicts and other undesirables who used the library. Back then there was no internet, so researchers had to use print resources. In the late 1980s we introduced CD-ROM based databases.
Let’s turn the clock to 2011 and the article mentioned above which discussed the Central Library Plan (CLP) for the landmark building now known as the Schwarzman Building. All libraries including NYPL have faced terrible budget cuts and had to cut staff and resources. The article states that a few specialized divisions were closed. The centerpiece of the CLP would be the construction of a state of the art computer orientated library. This would mean demolishing the stacks that hold 3 million books.
The controversy as stated in the article is to decide if the Schwarzman should remain as a depository for scholarly printed materials or should it become a computer orientated library. At the risk of the ire of some of my librarian colleagues, I choose the latter.
Over the past 20 years more and more popular and scholarly publications have become electronic. I have seen many students refuse to touch a print resource even if it has the information they need. A move to an electronic library will actually bring more people to NYPL which implies more private funds coming in. The printed materials that are displaced can be moved to either the stack extension under Bryant Park or the storage facility in Princeton, NJ. As time passes, these materials will be used less often. If there is a space problem, perhaps some of the research libraries such as NYU or Columbia can adopt them. The article states that there is a pilot program in place that allows certain NYPL users to check out books from Columbia or NYU. In any event, it would be impossible to digitize every scholarly publication.
Just some thoughts from a librarian with over 30 years in the field.
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Free E-Books with Advertisements
Today a colleague brought to my attention Bookboon , a web site that offers free e-books. They currently offer textbooks, business books, and travel guides. The only "catch" is that each e-book has advertisements in the text. Perhaps this business model will work and expand. After all haven't we watched television shows with commericals for two generations? If it can save students money, it should work.
Monday, November 21, 2011
Thoughts on the declining number of reference transactions
The number of reference transactions continues to decline. It is frustrating to sit at the reference desk and observe numerous students pass by without asking a question. A few years ago as a student approached the desk I said “Can I help you?” His response was no, I just wanted to use the waste basket. But what are the reasons for this decline?
1. Information Literacy instruction is working. Students have learned from their instruction and are applying the skills they have learned.
2. The publishers have succeeded in providing databases that students can learn by themselves. They can effectively use a search strategy, evaluate the references, retrieve the articles they need and use them in their papers.
3. Students are happy with what they find by searching Google. The publishers often make their search engines resemble Google.
4. Students are embarrassed to approach the reference desk. During every class I give I invite students to come ask questions, but they seldom do.
Do any of my readers have any thoughts on how to encourage students to ask questions?
1. Information Literacy instruction is working. Students have learned from their instruction and are applying the skills they have learned.
2. The publishers have succeeded in providing databases that students can learn by themselves. They can effectively use a search strategy, evaluate the references, retrieve the articles they need and use them in their papers.
3. Students are happy with what they find by searching Google. The publishers often make their search engines resemble Google.
4. Students are embarrassed to approach the reference desk. During every class I give I invite students to come ask questions, but they seldom do.
Do any of my readers have any thoughts on how to encourage students to ask questions?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

